top of page

WWII BATTLEFIELD RESEARCH AND PRESERVATION GROUP - MIA Search Project Part-1 -updated February 2, 2022

SymbolLargeprint.jpg

Project #BRPG201704-1; Author WWIIBRPG

US Army Air Forces bomber shot down 

Project: MIA search

Date: Started April 2017 – current date
Location: Benelux


Four seasons into the project, an update of progress. As mentioned with the security of the location and certain details concerning the case, some information will be limited or sanitized.

4338911rend.jpg

HUMANITARIAN MISSION - United States Army Air Force B-17G 43-38911 "Bull Session"
Location of the crash site and credible location of missing Airmen

A search began in 2017 with goals of establishing the wreck site/sites for the aircraft USAAF, B-17 43-38911, “Bull Session”. This aircraft was shot down on 14 January 1945 as it entered the West Luxembourg border area. It belonged to the 91st Bomber Group, 323rd Bomber Squadron of Bassingborn UK, AAF Station- 121. The 323rd was on a mission to Koln Germany to bomb a bridge and rail yards. Testament based on the only living witness, bombardier, Lt. James E. Buescher states that the aircraft took flak direct in mid-ship instantly exploding and descended until hitting the ground.

The bombardier James D. Buescher was thrown clear. He managed to open his chute and was soon captured, later being liberated in April 1945.
 

The Missing Air Crew Report (MACR) indicates this aircraft crashed to the ground in the vicinity 50, 02’05.23 N, 6.10’28.13” E. The MACR also claims the aircraft suffered a direct hit in the nose, peeling it from the front back to bulkhead #6. This is disputed by the bombardier and is justified, if it was a direct frontal nose hit he would not have been pushed through the nose and survived the fall.
 

There are several different theories on what exactly happened to the aircraft and the location it crashed at, none as yet is correct. Two crew members, remain to this day missing. The ultimate goal is to discover the wreck site, verify the site, and try to discover any evidence of the remains of the two missing airmen. Recovery will be carried out by the US government.
 

The search of Bull Session began 6 years ago in a dense 4.5 square kilometer forest area of a combination of pine, oak, beech, and birch trees, inhabited by loads of deer, both large and small varieties, raccoons, wild boar, fox, badgers, wild cats, and other small animals. The search began on what was very little to be known at the time about its crash location. Information is only based on a couple of photos and local accounts after the war while salvaging pieces of the plane from the forest. The recovered remains of the Pilot, Co-Pilot, and Navigator were found near and in the area in 1945/46. In summer 2017, 70% of the forest had been searched, as much of the 4.5 square km area as possible, only turning up a few small aluminum pieces and a half dozen rivets. Once the primary location/s of wreckage is found, a focused search for the two MIA would pursue.

Some aircraft debris landed in a wooded area as well as the body of the pilot, Lt. William E. Meyer buried in a shallow grave, discovered in 1946. Also found were the co-pilot, Lt. Laurin P. Otting, and navigator Nello  F. Fiorio that were buried temporarily in the village cemetery by Germans. The sole survivor Lt. James E Buescher was captured near a village closest to the wreck site - (wreck site IDed as "Sneakin Deacon" 2020). This area between the wreck site and the remains recovered is highly suspected to be the place of MIA-1. Ongoing interviews in the area are being conducted to narrow down the area where the crew was found.
 
A second debris area, of which three bodies were found, one (X-19), 30 days later identified as Sgt Robert P. Garret, two other positively identified crew members (Sgt Robert M. Wagner and Sgt Authur W. Miller) were said to be with an unidentified X-15 (since has been debunked in 2021as one of the crewmen found). In all, aircraft wreckage is spread over a 15 km distance SW-NE. The trail of debris and direction are giving good indicators for area and direction to search.

breakuptheorySanitised.jpg

SUMMARY OF 2017 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

In 2017 a goal of establishing the wreck site/sites of aircraft was initiated. Once the location of the wreckage is found and verified as the serial numbered aircraft, a focused search for the two MIA crew will pursue on-site as well as in a designated debris zone. A 2Km radius area was granted by a Government permit, compiling a 4.5Km area square of dense forest and open fields.  By end of summer 2017, 70% of the area has been covered extensively while some less due to thick in-accessible areas of growth till winter and second season.
 

SanitizedZonescvrd.jpg

Some aircraft debris was found, but not in quantities to indicate aircraft wreckage primary impacting sites. The following is a list of finds for 2017.
Aircraft evidence found and recovered:
- 8 aircraft rivets (AN426AD4) -pic
-Three pieces of aircraft aluminum siding, from the airframe.- pic
- Fragments of an electronic box from onboard.-pic
- Two pieces of aluminum from the servo motor cover? This area is under thick vegetation and needs to be
  investigated further.
- Winter 2017- Recent information with a possible wreckage location and debris has been reported. Several significant fragments of aircraft debris have been recovered, all parts suggest to be the engine, wing
sections, and possible cabin. An in-depth search is to be done to establish aircraft identity and revile clues as to the crew. 

2017 Closing

​Over winter 2017-2018, as stated before, several mistakes in past US Government reports were discovered concerning locations of debris/remains found in 1945. There was confusion about village names and Latitude/Longitude coordinates of the last known position. To further complicate the case, it is said that there is a second aircraft crash in the same area, and is the same type of plane. Ongoing research into archives and US army reports are not producing any evidence at this time of any such event, nor are there any MACR available, no crew names, and no aircraft serial number. One example of the confusion put forth is that the aircraft in site A was said to have been an earlier model "F" aircraft due to a data plate of the exhaust collector. This was later debunked in the summer of 2018 when a data plate of the port wing was found showing it to be late model "G" aircraft, as well as debris that would only be of a later model aircraft. Engine swaps with cannibalization of older models on the flight-line were very common. 

IMG_0179.JPG
IMG_0180.JPG

In these pictures, you can see that the wing tag was originally pre-stamped for the fabrication on an "F" model, later after manufacturing the new "G" models, Boeing used up the old tags and stamped a "G" over the "F".  They sure would not have made a brand new model and then stamp it as an old no longer built type.

IMG_3802_EGSU_JUN2011_G12.jpg
b17-engine-change.jpg

Maintenance personnel of the 92 BG, swapp out engines of B-17s on the filed. National Archives, USAAF

IMG_4034_EGSU_JUN2011_G12.jpg
Fold3_Page_1_Black_and_White_and_Color_P

Final Thought

​

​

​To be perfectly clear to the public and people who use detectors, this is a scientific approach project. As a recognized partner and supported by the governing officials as well as all commune authorities. We are not trinket hunting, military artifact hunting, or doing this for personal gain. When munitions are found the ordinance disposal teams and police are informed for public safety, exact locations are not divulged. All site discovery of Archaeological value is recorded and reported to the state. Remains will be reported to authorities of the state and US government.

 

The integrity of Scientific research
 

We are clearly aware and do not support trespassing without permission, or conducting illegal activities for monetary enrichment, non-historically motivated, or extraction of unexploded ordinance. There are always those out there that spoil it for all, leaving open holes, trash, or live ordnance laying around, not contacting the authorities.  We are in it for historical, heritage, and educational purposes, building on history, following scientific and operational protocols.
 

​

bottom of page